It's also sometimes more limited than that in first-party software. While it supports a vast range of cameras from many manufacturers – even a couple of older Canon models that DPP no longer recognizes – that support can take some time to arrive after the release of new cameras. While it only supports Raws shot by the company's own cameras, you can expect full Raw support for almost every Canon camera to be available more or less immediately upon release.Ĭlick or tap for the full-sized ACR version here for DPP versionīy contrast, ACR comes with a recurring subscription fee. You already paid for DPP when you bought your Canon DSLR, so it's effectively free. Of course, the most immediately obvious differences between ACR and DPP are their camera support and pricetag. For DPP, I saved at JPEG quality 8, producing near-identical file sizes. Images processed in ACR were saved at JPEG quality 11, just as used in our galleries. To avoid getting too far into the weeds, sharpness and noise reduction were left at their defaults, while lens corrections were enabled for both apps with the exception of distortion correction, so as to make for easier comparison to our reference shots from the gallery.

I've chosen images from the EOS R for use in this comparison, for reasons we'll come to in a moment.Īdobe Camera Raw version 12.4's user interface. To ensure neither Adobe nor Canon had any advantage out of the gate, I've aimed to reproduce, as closely as possible, the look of already-processed images from our galleries, without any prior knowledge as to the recipes behind them. My computer is a 2018-vintage Dell laptop running Windows 10 version 1909.

In this article, I'm comparing Adobe Camera Raw 12.4 alongside Adobe Bridge 10.1.1 versus Canon Digital Photo Professional 4.12.60.0, all of which are their current versions.

In the interests of keeping things to a readable length, I'm limiting myself only to image editing, and won't address features like image management, tethering or printing. That's a question we've wanted to answer for a while now, and one which I'll discuss in a new series of articles comparing the user interfaces, performance and image quality of the manufacturer's apps with those of their much-vaunted Adobe rival. But is that a smart move in our newly-normal, more cost-conscious world, or could you get by just as well with your camera's bundled software?Ĭanon Digital Photo Professional version 4.12's user interface. If you're like many photographers, the first thing you do upon taking a brand-new camera out of its package is to set aside the included software download info (or, with older cameras, the CD or DVD), opting instead for a third-party option like Adobe's Camera Raw or Lightroom.

Adobe camera raw windows 10